My Personality

After taking two personality questionnaires, I have discovered my personality is ESTJ, which stands for Extraverted, Sensing, Thinking, and Judging.
For me, being extraverted as opposed to introverted is quite the advantage in my line of work. I like discussing ideas with others and learning from my peers. It also allows me to talk to students and build a rapport with them. Being extraverted allows me to open up more channels of communication which helps me to get things done efficiently and exchange ideas freely.
I am more Sensing than Intuitive, which means I prefer to focus on concrete facts and step-by-step instruction. This makes sense within my content area, mathematics. Math is based on concrete ideas and is often done in a step-by-step fashion.
Mathematics is also an appropriate content area when one looks at the third part of the personality type, Thinking over Feeling. I prefer logic and facts as opposed to how something makes me feel. Math does not contain tone or emotion, it is all about logic and working through to solve problems, which appeals to my personality type.
The final piece of my personality is Judgment in contrast to Perception. I believe that this makes me more rigid when it comes to how I like things done, which attributes to what some people call my "Type A" behavior. However, I do possess some of the Perceptive personality traits like being more flexible when I am teaching. Fortunately, thinking about mathematics allows me to have structure and makes things black and white where I feel more comfortable.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teaching Style

Image
To be honest, I don't feel that Grasha's Teaching Styles Inventory was very illuminating to me. Maybe it was just the way that I answered all the questions, but I felt that it didn't really tell me how I taught. All the answers seemed to be close, but it deemed some of the areas high even though the number seemed low. Maybe this doesn't make sense to me because I am more of a visual learner (see previous post) and it didn't include a diagram. Or because I am a mathematical person who relies on number sense and objectivity and the quiz deemed a 2.87 High while a 3.12 Moderate (see the post before the previous one). Regardless of the scoring system, the quiz seems to have identified my teaching style as "Expert." This actually makes sense to me because I am quite good at math (I have yet to see the word " humble" appear in any of my questionnaire results). My degree is in mathematics and I am currently working to get my Masters in Mathematics
Read more

Learning Map

Here is my Learning Map for Assignment 1B. I know that the assignment says to use the map we made in TED 632, but that was over a year ago for me and I didn't like it, so I made a new one. I used the last week of school that I taught, where my Integrated II students were getting a jump on Integrated III/Precalculus topics. I had some difficulty coming up with the real world applications, because polynomials tend to be a bit abstract for these students. Though it didn't go into any of these real world applications, one that we often talk about is roller coasters. polynomials can be written to represent the same of roller coasters to help designers and physicists accurately create safe and fun coasters.  Day of the Week Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Essential Question When we add functions, do we still have a function? Of the same degree? What about when we multiply functions? Do we have to factor (x+1) raised to the 6 five time
Read more

Takeaways from the Text

Unfortunately, I only able to access one of the texts for this course, Checking for Understanding , by Fisher & Frey. I liked this book because in the past I have struggled with assessing my students and finding out they knew less than I thought they did. I have made it my personal goal to find as many ways to check for understanding as possible while remaining efficient and effective. The ten main ideas from this book that I want to take away are as follows: 1. Determine the purpose of the lesson with clarity. 2. Give lots of feedback. 3. Checking for understanding is not the final exam. 4. The difference between formative and summative assessments. 5. Implement the "Backward Design Process." 6. Use Intentional Targeted Teaching. 7. Employ Think-Pair-Share. 8. Develop hand signals. 9. Use foldables. 10. Try common assessments and consensus. For more information on each of these takeaways, view my PowerPoint Presentation: https://docs.google.com/presentation/
Read more